Text Box: Rounded Rectangle: How the CSA try to silence us


After receiving our data prints from the CSA it proved  what goes on behind closed doors within the Agency. They even provided a copy of a recording between ourselves and a case worker, and at no time did they state that the call was being recorded.

 What we want to draw your attention to is this particular report from the Longbenton department, where, I had asked them perfectly lawful questions regarding the law and the stance of the CSA, take a look below, this was in with our data pack

















































“Child Maintenance is a requirement in this country, it is the Agency’s responsibility to assess, collect and enforce.” Enforce means Prevention of a crime, what crime is committed? Saving of life and limb ( is theis life threatening or is a limb to be lost? And self defence, well is the Agency under a threat of attack????


(“Remind him that they operate within the framework agreed by Parliament.” This they are stating about Parliament, who are yet  another run for profit company, you could check this out on Dun and Bradstreet who are a global credit reference agency for business’s and companies, you will find Houses of Parliament and the House of Lords all trading as a company, however since publishing this a few years ago Dun and Bradstreet hid all of these companies from the public eye



They seem to think that it is unreasonable to expect 100% accuracy and that is why they have a complaints and appeal system, is it unreasonable to expect even 20% accuracy from the Agency is what we should be asking, because the amount of complaints that are coming in to us is unbelievable, why should they have an appeal system, why can’t they get it right first time? Its all in the plan on how they are programmed to run, to make up figures, abuse powers, manipulate courts in order to unlawfully enforce unenforceable orders, the actual  procedure is all planned very carefully to work that way.


 They are concerned that we are targeting specific people and they are informing staff to ask us to desist. Get over it, you target fathers, and we are all equal;


They want to apologise for the backlog within their Data Protection Department and they want to provide us with some assurance they are aware of this. We have scrutinised the data Protection Act and we cannot find anywhere where it states the Child Support Agency is exempt from this act if they have a backlog, this is more proof that the Agency think they are above the law.


Now we come to the interesting part, “do not deal with  his Magna Carta points –unless someone wishes to put him straight” This is really interesting how Ronan does not want to look at or answer the questions relating to Magna Carta 1297 section 29 !

We can assure you that Ronan will not answer this question because neither he nor any Agency staff are legally qualified to answer the question he


They state again that we will not be having a meeting now or in the future, really Ronan?, our paths will cross we can assure you of that.

It is also interesting that they wish the Stakeholders to manage our Association, and to point us towards the mainstream. We wonder what the mainstream could be?. Well we can all surmise who the Stakeholders are, we already know who they are! so next time they enquire as to how we are running and how we are fairing within the world of Liability Orders etc we know what we can say, absolutely nothing!!

More proof the CSA is a company, if they have stakeholders or shareholders, then they are a company. Dead Beat Dads will not be part of this Agency, and we will not be bought nor silenced. We are fighting for our common law rights to be used rather than dictatorship rules imposed by a company trading as The Government



If you notice here they say do not deal with Magna Carta Policies, the reason behind this is because nobody at the CSA CMS are legally qualified.

Notice how they want to steer us away from the crooks of their corruption and fraudulent ways of obtaining money through false claims and false private court hearings